wolfenotes.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the wolfenotes.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host wolfenotes.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Pair Networks .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2.4.34 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

holding polluters and government accountable home about the nj supreme court ruled that dep is in charge of management of black bears, including policy on whether to hunt september 24th, 2018 bill wolfe no comments fish and game council “independence constrained” – “subjugation to dep authority” dep approval is a “condition precedent” to the council’s pursuit of a hunt statements by gov. murphy & dep commissioner mccabe are flat out false in the event that comprehensive policies are agreed on and a dispute arises between the commissioner and the fish and game council over whether a hunt or any other preservation or propagation methodology is justified, the [dep’s] comprehensive policies will provide the standard for adjudicating the issue. ~~~ nj supreme court statements by gov. murphy – including provisions of his executive order #34 – and the legislative testimony of his dep commissioner catherine mccabe regarding their alleged lack of power to over-rule the fish and game council and block the black bear hunt are flat out false and directly contradict the nj supreme court’s ruling on that very issue. i want to be very clear here, so let’s break this down. first we will restate the governor’s statements – which as i previously wrote are echoed in the text of executive order #34. next, we will excerpt text from the supreme court’s ruling that applies to each statement. we will do the same thing for dep commissioner mccabe’s testimony to the senate budget committee last may in response to a direct question by senator greenstein: greenstein question : “will the dep uphold governor murphy’s commitment to stopping the bear hunt this year and to look at nonlethal methods for bear control?” mccabe response: “the legal authority for controlling the bear hunt resides, as you may know, with the fish and game council and we have consulted with the attorney general and advised the governor’s office of that. …. in order to change that [the hunt], we would have to go back to the game council and provide some evidence of why a different arrangement, or the science would argue for reducing the amount of hunting or eliminating the hunting. “ (listen to testimony) apparently based on commissioner mccabe’s recommendation, the governor made 3 claims, all of them false, as follows: 1) the fish and game council is in exclusively charge of the bear hunt: “[the council] has the sole authority to authorize a bear hunt.” 2) the governor has no power to cancel the hunt: “pursuant to a new jersey supreme court decision in 2005 and other related court decisions, if the council recommends a bear hunt and properly adopts regulations implementing a hunt, the governor does not have the ability to unilaterally cancel it,” 3) the legislature must act: “in order for the hunt to be stopped, either the legislature must act or the council must adopt new regulations that do not include provisions for the hunt.” 4) the governor’s statement also is false by material omission, because he failed to mention the powers of his dep authorized by the legislature and upheld by the supreme court. it is also false and misleading by stating that the supreme court somehow limited the governor’s powers regarding the hunt. however, the court said nothing about the powers of the governor. 5) mccabe’s testimony is false and misleading. it is false by material omission regarding what the court found regarding dep’s power over the fish and game council. it is misleading by conflating “science” with the dep’s “comprehensive conservation policy” powers that the court upheld. as mccabe – a lawyer and former us epa environmental appeals board judge – surely knows, dep “policy” is a far broader power and administrative enterprise than “science”. 6) the gov.’s. statement also badly mis-states the law and his executive order violates the nj constitution’s separation of powers and raises “non-delegation doctrine” issues. the gov. claims that he lacks executive power to over-ride the fish and game council. let’s examine that claim in light of some basics. the fish and game council was created by the legislature and, as the supreme court ruled, is subject (the court used the term “subjugation”) to dep authority discharged by the dep commissioner. the dep is an executive branch agency and the commissioner is nominated by, confirmed by the senate and serves at the pleasure of the governor . the gov. may not direct the dep commissioner to violate the law, but he can direct the dep commissioner to implement public policy that is in the public interest, as authorized by the legislature ad upheld by the supreme court. the council, after approval by gov. christie’s dep commissioner bob martin, adopted a “comprehensive black bear management plan” via regulation in august 2010 which included a hunt. that cbbmp was updated, expanded, and renewed via regulation in october 2015 . the updated cbbmp regulation expires and is in effect until 2021. regardless of the expiration date, no administrative agency has the power to legally and irreversibly bind a future administration. to do so would grant the fish and game council legislative powers because the christie dep and f&g council would be binding a new governor and dep. that is a violation of the separation of powers embodied in the nj constitution. it also could be a violation of the “non-delegation doctrine”, by delegating dep’s superior conservation policy powers to the f&g council. additionally, it violates constitutional “anti-entrenchment” principles. by analogy, it is well settled law that “one legislature may not bind the legislative authority of its successors ” ( united states, petitioner v. winstar corporation et al.) a similar principle holds, but for different reasons, to the executive branch. the dep has the authority delegated by the legislature to propose, adopt, amend, and repeal regulations. the cbbmp is implemented via a regulation and amendment to dep game code. dep, as recognized by the supreme court, has exclusive power to adopt “conservation policies” that bind the fish and game council and govern the the black bear population and the management thereof. contrary to what dep commissioner mccabe claims, the dep does not have to “go back” to the fish and game council to get their approval of regulations to amend regulations. the murphy dep could adopt statewide “conservation policies” via regulation and/or simply amend or repeal the current christie dep game code regulations that govern the bear hunt to eliminate hunting as a management tool and instead rely on non-lethal management methods. that regulatory policy change does not need to be based exclusively on “science”, as recognized by the court who upheld dep’s “conservation policy” powers. the supreme court ruled that when there is conflict between dep policies and the fish and game council, then dep supersedes the council: in the event that comprehensive policies are agreed on and a dispute arises between the commissioner and the fish and game council over whether a hunt or any other preservation or propagation methodology is justified, the comprehensive policies will provide the standard for adjudicating the issue. the dep could adopt regulatory policies via emergency rule making, which does not require public notice, hearings and comment prior to adoption. so there is time to do this before the planned december hunt. the governor also has broad executive powers – including emergency powers – to stop the hunt and direct dep to act. obviously, governors have the power to change administrative policy. that’s what elections are all about. the nj governor, constitutionally, has perhaps the most powerful executive branch power of any governor in the country. but we won’t go into those powers today. let’s just say it is ludicrous to argue that an “in but not of” council, comprised of private self interested hunters and farmers who promote hunting, has power dictate policy to and to over-rule the

URL analysis for wolfenotes.com

http://www.wolfenotes.com/2014/05/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/2008/07/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/04/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/2016/05/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/2013/11/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/2017/02/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/2009/10/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/2017/06/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/category/personal/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/2017/10/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/about/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/2015/01/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/author/bwolfe/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/2017/03/
http://www.wolfenotes.com/2009/06/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: WOLFENOTES.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1558979181_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.pairdomains.com
Registrar URL: http://www.pairdomains.com
Updated Date: 2017-05-17T19:09:31Z
Creation Date: 2009-06-12T15:46:47Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-06-12T15:46:47Z
Registrar: pair Networks, Inc. d/b/a pair Domains
Registrar IANA ID: 99
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Name Server: DNS.PAIR.COM
Name Server: NS7.NS0.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-10-04T23:27:23Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR pair Networks, Inc. d/b/a pair Domains

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =wolfenotes.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME wolfenotes.com

  CHANGED 2017-05-17

  CREATED 2009-06-12

STATUS
ok https://icann.org/epp#ok

NSERVER

  DNS.PAIR.COM 209.68.5.246

  NS7.NS0.COM 216.92.151.254

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .